TerraLogic - Summary Accuracy: leaderboard

Part of TerraLogic (CUHK-Shenzhen and TUM, 2026): 545 scenario-driven geospatial reasoning tasks over optical, SAR and infrared imagery solved through verifiable tool chains, each model driving the HieraPlan reference agent. The score is step-by-step accuracy of the summaries written from tool outputs in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Summary-generation accuracy (SummAcc) (%) in the step-by-step setting over the 545 TerraLogic optical, SAR and infrared remote-sensing tasks, each model driving the HieraPlan tool agent under a ReAct-style protocol in OpenCompass; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o82.83#741
2Llama 3 70B Instruct69.91#1676
3Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct65.32#2564
4DeepSeek V360.92#716
5GPT-3.559.08#2417
6Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct58.9#1215
7InternLM3-8B-Instruct50.28#2568
8Gemini 2.5 Flash47.22#453
9Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.2)46.06#7007
10Yi-1.5-6B-Chat37.98#6399
11Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct10.09#6810

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=terralogic-summary-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.