TerraLogic - Instruction Following: leaderboard

Part of TerraLogic (CUHK-Shenzhen and TUM, 2026): 545 scenario-driven geospatial reasoning tasks over optical, SAR and infrared imagery solved through verifiable tool chains, each model driving the HieraPlan reference agent. The score is step-by-step instruction-following accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Instruction-following accuracy (InstAcc) (%) in the step-by-step setting over the 545 TerraLogic optical, SAR and infrared remote-sensing tasks, each model driving the HieraPlan tool agent under a ReAct-style protocol in OpenCompass; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o79.4#741
2Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct77.19#2564
3Llama 3 70B Instruct67.89#1676
4DeepSeek V365.84#716
5Yi-1.5-6B-Chat63.38#6399
6Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct62.83#1215
7InternLM3-8B-Instruct61.26#2568
8Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.2)60.03#7007
9Gemini 2.5 Flash59.09#453
10GPT-3.559.05#2417
11Phi-3 Mini 4K Instruct55.45#6810

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=terralogic-instruction-following · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.