TelemetrySuffBench - Fault-Type Classification: leaderboard

TelemetrySuffBench (East China Normal University, 2026) tests whether a language model can pinpoint the origin of a fault in an agent execution trace given full telemetry, separating fault detection from origin localization over 216 delayed-binding fault traces. Fault-type macro-F1 scores the two-class taxonomy of wrong-reference-binding versus stale-reference-state, in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Fault-type macro-F1 (%; two-class taxonomy of wrong-reference-binding vs stale-reference-state; over TelemetrySuffBench's 216 delayed-binding fault traces; full-telemetry view; closed candidate sets, invalid outputs scored zero). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.579.9#48
2Claude Opus 577.7#20
3GPT-5.6 Sol76#29
4DeepSeek V4 Pro55.3#181
5Qwen 3.7 Max39.8#142

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=telemetrysuffbench-fault-type-classification · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.