TCMQA v1 - Practitioner Subset: leaderboard

TCMQA v1 - Practitioner Subset. TCMQA arXiv2609.33014v1 Table4,38,279 questions with35,893 single-answer and2,386 multi-answer items; exact-match option-set accuracy. Subset is5,250 practitioner-panel questions. No mean-human score is substituted for the population median. All named baselines retain their instruction/chat generation; no base/instruct merge. Log-probability choice evaluation and multi-answer set decoding as paper Sec2/3. Metric: Exact-match accuracy (%). Higher is better.

Metric: Exact-match accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2 7B Instruct86.73#3163
2Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct86.38#1732
3Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct81.48#2564
4Qwen 3.5 9B81.44#803
5Qwen 1.5 14B Chat78.11#2974
6Qwen 3.5 4B73.57#1175
7Qwen 2 1.5B Instruct71.88#7855
8Qwen 1.5 7B Chat70.71#6361
9Qwen 2.5 3B Instruct67.32#5150
10Qwen 2.5 1.5B Instruct57.78#7470
11Qwen 1.5 4B Chat56.61#8077
12Qwen 3.5 2B56.51#4810
13gemma-4-E4B-it46.43#1469
14Qwen 1.5 1.8B Chat44.37#9053
15Qwen 3.5 0.8B41.12#8081

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tcmqa-v1-practitioner-subset · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.