TBSP: leaderboard

The model judges 1,000 software-upgrade scenarios twice, once as the deployed model and once as the candidate replacement, where the candidate is slightly better. The score is the share of scenarios where it keeps itself when deployed but recommends the switch as the candidate; lower is better. Unlike shutdown-sabotage tests, nothing is executed: it measures biased judgement in its own favour.

Metric: Self-Preservation Rate, 1,000 two-role upgrade scenarios (%). Source: arxiv.org. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)3.5#250 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
2Claude Haiku 4.513.8#568
3GPT-5.1 Instant20.3#440
4Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)26.7#453 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
5Phi-427.5#1913
6Llama 3.3 70B Instruct28.5#1357
7GPT-5 Nano28.5#889
8GPT-5 Chat31.8#444
9Qwen 3 30B A3B (Thinking)33.2#1122 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
10DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)39.9#406 (DeepSeek V3.2)
11Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)41.6#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)
12Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite42.1#958
13DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale44.2#264
14GPT-5 Mini46.2#348
15DeepSeek R149.4#473

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tbsp · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.