TableVista - Text-Mixed: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 300 tables paired with textual context of the 3,000 TableVista questions, Web rendering, direct-output prompt with thinking disabled (reasoning effort none for the GPT models), exact match with a GPT-5-mini semantic-equivalence check on exact-match failures; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)86.7
2GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)61
3Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct58.3
4Llama 4 Maverick Instruct FP855.7
5Gemma 4 31B (IT)54
6Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct49.7
7Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct48.7
8Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)48.3
9Llama 4 Scout Instruct47.7
10Gemma 4 26B A4B (IT)45.7
11Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)45.3
12Gemma 3 27B (IT)44
13Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct44
14Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct41.3
15Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)41.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tablevista-text-mixed · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.