TableVista - Simulated Photo: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 3,000 TableVista questions under the vision-only Simulated Photo setting (screen capture with moire and perspective distortion), direct-output prompt with thinking disabled (reasoning effort none for the GPT models), exact match with a GPT-5-mini semantic-equivalence check on exact-match failures; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)67.3
2Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct54
3Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)53.5
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)53.5
5Llama 4 Maverick Instruct FP851.8
6Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct49.8
7Llama 4 Scout Instruct47.2
8Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct44.6
9Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)44.5
10Gemma 4 31B (IT)44.2
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct42.4
12Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct40
13Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)37.9
14GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)37.7
15Gemma 3 27B (IT)37.5

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tablevista-simulated-photo · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.