TableVista - Screen Capture: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 3,000 TableVista questions under the vision-only Screen Capture setting (question, context and table rendered in one image), direct-output prompt with thinking disabled (reasoning effort none for the GPT models), exact match with a GPT-5-mini semantic-equivalence check on exact-match failures; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)69.4
2Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct57.4
3Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)55.1
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)54.3
5Llama 4 Maverick Instruct FP853.4
6Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct51.1
7Llama 4 Scout Instruct46.7
8Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)46.1
9Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct45.3
10Gemma 4 31B (IT)42.2
11GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)42
12Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct41.6
13Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct41.1
14Gemma 3 27B (IT)40.1
15Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)39.7

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tablevista-screen-capture · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.