TableVista - Long Table: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 700 long tables of the 3,000 TableVista questions, Web rendering, direct-output prompt with thinking disabled (reasoning effort none for the GPT models), exact match with a GPT-5-mini semantic-equivalence check on exact-match failures; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)68.9
2Gemma 4 31B (IT)54.4
3Llama 4 Maverick Instruct FP852.3
4Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct52.1
5Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)50.9
6Llama 4 Scout Instruct49.7
7Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)49.4
8GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)48.7
9Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct48.3
10Gemma 4 26B A4B (IT)44.1
11Gemma 3 27B (IT)43.7
12Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct42.4
13Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct41.9
14Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct41.9
15Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)40.3

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=tablevista-long-table · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.