SWE-Serve: leaderboard

SWE-Serve (2026) evaluates coding agents on production inference-serving engineering with 53 repository-level tasks derived from merged SGLang changes, each scored by hidden functional, regression, end-to-end serving and performance tests under a closed-book network policy. The metric is mean pass@1 over three complete benchmark runs, in percent, higher is better; every model is run under the mini-SWE-agent harness and shown at each reasoning-effort setting evaluated.

Metric: pass@1 (%; mean over three runs of the fraction of the 53 tasks whose agent patch passes every hidden functional, regression, E2E and performance test; mini-SWE-agent harness, closed-book). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)75.5#29 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Claude Opus 5 (Max)75.5#20 (Claude Opus 5)
3Claude Opus 5 (High)73.6#20 (Claude Opus 5)
4Claude Opus 5 (xHigh)72.3#20 (Claude Opus 5)
5Claude Opus 5 (Medium)68.6#20 (Claude Opus 5)
6GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)66#29 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
7Kimi K3 (Max)64.2#53 (Kimi K3)
8GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)64.2#117 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
9GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)64.2#60 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
10Claude Sonnet 5 (xHigh)64.2#108 (Claude Sonnet 5)
11Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)61#108 (Claude Sonnet 5)
12Claude Opus 5 (Low)60.4#20 (Claude Opus 5)
13Claude Sonnet 5 (High)57.9#108 (Claude Sonnet 5)
14GPT-5.6 Sol (High)56#29 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
15GPT-5.6 Luna (xHigh)55.3#117 (GPT-5.6 Luna)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=swe-serve · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.