SWE Refactor Bench: leaderboard

A whole-repository stack migration held open for a hundred-odd steps: change the framework the codebase is built on and leave it working. Every model is run at each of its harness's effort tiers, and the best any of them manages is 47 out of 100 — the behavioural test suite mostly passes, the migration mostly does not.

Metric: Score (out of 100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5 (xHigh)47#12 (Claude Opus 5)
2Claude Opus 5 (High)34.5#12 (Claude Opus 5)
3Claude Opus 5 (Max)31#12 (Claude Opus 5)
4GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)28.5#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
5Claude Opus 5 (Medium)28.5#12 (Claude Opus 5)
6Claude Opus 5 (Low)20.5#12 (Claude Opus 5)
7Kimi K3 (Max)19.5#30 (Kimi K3)
8GPT-5.6 Sol (High)19#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
9Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)15#57 (Claude Sonnet 5)
10GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)10.5#68 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
11Qwen 3.8 Max (Max)10#35 (Qwen 3.8 Max)
12GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)9.5#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
13Claude Sonnet 5 (xHigh)9#57 (Claude Sonnet 5)
14Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)8.5#57 (Claude Sonnet 5)
15DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)7#137 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=swe-refactor-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.