SWE-PRBench - Hallucination Rate: leaderboard

Metric: Hallucination rate (%): share of the model's review comments the judge classes as fabricated (code not in context or factually wrong claims), on a stratified 100-PR sample of SWE-PRBench (40 direct, 40 contextual and 20 latent-difficulty pull requests from active open-source repositories), each model asked at temperature 0 for 4 to 6 line-anchored review comments as JSON, a GPT-5.2 judge matching them to the human reviewers' comments (confirmed, plausible or fabricated), averaged over the three context configurations; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4o19.3#333
2Claude Sonnet 4.622.7#85
3Mistral Small25.1#700
4DeepSeek V331.5#312
5Claude Haiku 4.534.6#271
6GPT-4o Mini35.3#588
7Mistral Large 335.3#388
8Llama 3.3 70B41.7#569

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=swe-prbench-hallucination-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.