StemBind: leaderboard

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often know the rule but pick the wrong answer: on abstract visual reasoning (AVR) tasks, a model can describe what it sees and name the underlying pattern, yet still fail to choose the matching candidate. Existing AVR benchmarks cannot detect this because they collapse perception, rule induction, and answer selection into a single right-or-wrong signal. We

Metric: F Overall (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 Plus42.2#125
2Qwen 3.5 27B41.3#187
3Qwen 3.5 35B A3B39.3#256
4Qwen 3.5 9B37.4#379
5Kimi K2.536.8#144
6Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)35.9#58
7Qwen 3.5 2B35.9#1148
8GLM-4.5V34.6#346
9Qwen 3.5 122B A10B33.8#173
10Qwen 3.5 4B33.8#475
11Gemma 4 31B (IT)33.1#176
12Gemma 4 26B A4B (IT)33#297
13GPT-5.431.8#79
14Claude Opus 4.730.7#49
15gemma-4-E4B-it30.6#566

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=stembind · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.