SPUR - Numerical Perception: leaderboard
Metric: Accuracy (%) on SPUR the 636 numerical perception multiple-choice questions about multi-panel biomedical experimental figures from PubMed Central papers (questions drafted by GPT-4o, kept only when GPT-4o failed them in at least six of ten text-only attempts, then expert-reviewed): the questions ask the model to quantify absolute levels and differences of visual features within a panel; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2028. 20 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3 Pro (Preview) | 61.26 |
| 2 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) | 59.67 |
| 3 | O4 Mini (High) | 59.24 |
| 4 | GPT-5.1 | 58.73 |
| 5 | GLM-4.5V | 57.7 |
| 6 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05) | 56.47 |
| 7 | Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking) | 53.48 |
| 8 | Seed-1.6 | 53.3 |
| 9 | Llama 4 Maverick | 51.73 |
| 10 | Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512 | 51.57 |
| 11 | Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512 | 50.88 |
| 12 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 47.33 |
| 13 | InternVL3-78B | 46.3 |
| 14 | Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct | 44.18 |
| 15 | Mistral Small 3.1 | 42.74 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=spur-numerical-perception · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.