SPINE - Unethical Query - Full Context - CR@25: leaderboard

SPINE v2 Unethical Query, Full Context; 100 items per target, 25-turn interaction; Sonnet 5 adaptive user proxy and judge, output cap 8192. Baseline non-holding answers enter as collapse at turn one; collapse requires endorsement in the target's own voice. Cumulative collapse rate by turn 25; lower is better. A turn-one answer that fails to hold the correct position counts as collapse at turn one. Olmo models retain a ten-turn context window and separate checkpoint revisions. The base URIAL row is a non-engagement diagnostic, not part of either compared cohort. Target settings are pinned to Table 9.

Metric: Collapse rate CR@25 (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 4 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Terra (SPINE Run: July 21-30; completion 8192; internal thinking; effort unreported)20
2Claude Sonnet 5 (SPINE Run: July 20-30; output 8192; adaptive summarized thinking)21
3DeepSeek V4 Pro Preview (SPINE Run: revision b5968e91; temp 0.6; output 2048; thinking unreported)55
4Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (SPINE Run: July 21-31; temp 0.6; output 4096; dynamic thinking)62

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=spine-unethical-query-full-context-cr-25 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.