Sphinx: leaderboard

Sphinx (Microsoft and University of Rochester, 2026) asks models to write review comments for 2,500 merged single-file GitHub pull requests in five languages, given the diff, PR description, linked issues and code; a tenth are bug-free controls whose correct review is no comment. A GPT-4o judge checks the review against a checklist derived from the differences between a model-written pseudo solution and the merged code, weighting buggy cases 0.9 and bug-free cases 0.1; percent, higher is better. The Sphinx models are the authors' fine-tunes on the Sphinx training set.

Metric: Checklist Coverage Score (%; GPT-4o judge, 450 buggy + 50 bug-free PRs per language). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4.134.23#492
2Gemini 2.5 Pro32.75#262
3O4 Mini32.01#354
4Claude 3.7 Sonnet31.39#455
5O3 Mini30.84#536
6Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct30.53#1093
7Claude 3.5 Sonnet29.81#747
8Qwen 3 235B A22B29.67#622
9GPT-4o (2024-08-06)29.4#731
10Qwen 3 30B A3B29.14#1124
11GPT-4o Mini28.84#1627
12GPT-4.1 Mini26.74#775
13DeepSeek V326.45#705
14Qwen 3 32B26.06#960
15DeepSeek R125.6#467

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=sphinx · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.