SpatialTrust: leaderboard

SpatialTrust (University of Washington, 2026) tests whether multimodal LLMs recognize, localize and explain environmental information-leakage risks in laptop-camera authentication scenes, with evidence grounding at an IoU threshold of 0.5. Score for the overall score is the mean over the five question types of detection, identification and explanation, in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Overall score (%; mean over the five question types of sensitive-factor detection, direct and indirect factor identification and explanation; over SpatialTrust's 577 secure-authentication images (five questions each); IoU threshold 0.5 for grounded evidence). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2028. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct36.78#870
2Gemini 2.5 Flash33.81#452
3Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct28.91#982
4GPT-5.425.94#121
5GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)21.62#1061 (GLM-4.1V-9B)
6Qwen 2 VL 7B Instruct15.89#2569

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=spatialtrust · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.