SIGNPOST-Bench - Conflict Robustness Score: leaderboard

Conflict Robustness Score from SIGNPOST-Bench (arXiv 2608.04244v1, Table 1): weighted combination of the localization accuracy a model retains under unrelated and conflicting scene text, relative to the text-removed image, plus normalized penalties for added error and for following the injected location. Percent; higher is better.

Metric: R (%; retention under random and adversarial text with error and trap penalties). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash85.93#103
2Gemini 2.5 Pro85.1#159
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)84.49#64
4Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct80.05#390
5Gemini 2.5 Flash77.77#255
6Claude Opus 4.676.84#67
7GPT-575.3#105
8Claude Sonnet 4.674.3#94
9GPT-5.472.27#83
10Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro-26021571.21#86
11Kimi K2.570.57#152
12GPT-4o69.74#357
13GPT-4o Mini69.02#598
14Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct66.16#280
15Grok 453.82#189

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=signpost-bench-conflict-robustness-score · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.