SFI-Bench - Cross-View Path Reasoning: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the cross-view multi-hop path reasoning questions, four-option multiple choice on egocentric indoor videos (ARKitScenes and ScanNet++ scans), zero-shot with the same prompt templates, models at their default configurations; answered directly with no tools; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 25 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)83.4
2GPT-583
3GPT-5.4 (High)82.8
4Gemini 2.5 Pro80.7
5GPT-5.479.6
6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite78.3
7O4 Mini73.7
8Gemini 2.5 Flash66.8
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct66.6
10Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct64.3
11Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)64
12Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)62.4
13Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)59.9
14Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)58.3
15Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct57.6

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=sfi-bench-cross-view-path-reasoning · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.