SAW-Bench - Spatial Affordance: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 162 spatial affordance questions (whether an action is physically feasible from the observer's viewpoint) of the SAW-Bench multiple-choice questions about 786 egocentric videos recorded with Ray-Ban Meta (Gen 2) smart glasses (no audio); zero-shot; 2 frames per second where the model supports it (32 frames, or 8 for InternVL3 38B and InternVL2 40B, otherwise); answers parsed by regular expression, else by GPT-4o-mini; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around August 2028. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)70.99#78
2Gemini 2.5 Pro66.05#145
3GPT-5.2 (Medium)62.96#105 (GPT-5.2)
4Gemini 3 Pro (Preview) (Low)61.73#64 (Gemini 3 Pro (Preview))
5Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct56.79#364
6Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct54.94#443
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)54.32#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
8Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)52.47#287 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
9InternVL3-38B51.23#395
10InternVL2-8B50#826
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)50#338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
12Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct49.38#643
13InternVL3-14B49.38#494
14GPT-5 Mini (2025-08-07)49.38#165
15Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)48.77

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=saw-bench-spatial-affordance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.