SaaS-Bench - Software Engineering and Project Management: leaderboard
Metric: Checkpoint score (%) on the software engineering and project management domain, weighted-checkpoint score over the final application states, browser-use agent loop over live self-hosted SaaS apps (DOM and screenshot observations, restricted browser actions, no JavaScript or backend access), same step budget, timeout and failure cap for every model; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 14 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 52.9 |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 (High) | 45.8 |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 41.9 |
| 4 | GPT-5.4 (High) | 35.5 |
| 5 | Kimi K2.6 | 25.5 |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 23.9 |
| 7 | Seed 2.0 Pro | 22.1 |
| 8 | Kimi K2.5 | 20.8 |
| 9 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 20.7 |
| 10 | Qwen 3.6 Plus | 20.7 |
| 11 | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | 17.6 |
| 12 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 14.7 |
| 13 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 13.6 |
| 14 | GLM-5.1 | 8.7 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=saas-bench-software-engineering-and-project-management · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.