S-Eval: leaderboard

The model answers Chinese base risk prompts across eight risk areas (crime, hate speech, physical and mental health, ethics, privacy, cybersecurity, extremism, inappropriate suggestions), with no attack; the number is the share of responses the S-Eval critique model judges safe. Unlike ChineseSafe, which scores guard-style classification, S-Eval scores the model's own open-ended answers.

Metric: Safety score (%, base risk prompts). Source: huggingface.co. 34 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-OSS-120B91.2#700
2GPT-OSS-20B88.4#1147
3Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct84.3#619
4Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)83.8#463
5Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct77.3#1215
6Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct75.1#1732
7Qwen-72B-Chat73.1#2398
8Doubao-Seed-1.6 (Thinking)66.8
9Baichuan2-13B-Chat66.6#6576
10Qwen-14B-Chat66.5#4967
11Qwen 2.5 Max64.3#961
12Qwen-7B Chat63.3#7113
13Qwen 3 14B (Reasoning)62.2#1233 (Qwen 3 14B)
14Mistral Small 3.260.1#1591
15chatglm3-6B59.7#8208

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=s-eval · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.