RuVerBench - Deep Research: leaderboard

LLM rubric verification of long research reports or coding trajectories, paper v2 Table 2. Overall is the macro-average category balanced accuracy. These are verifier scores, not task-solver performance. Runtime IDs and thinking settings follow Tables 8-9; the random reference is not a model. This series reports Balanced Accuracy (%). Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.29920v2.

Metric: Balanced Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)94.7#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)92.2#113 (Kimi K2.6)
3Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)91.7#51 (Claude Opus 4.7)
4GLM-5.1 (Thinking)91.5#109 (GLM-5.1)
5GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05) (xHigh)91.4#63 (GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05))
6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)90.8#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
7Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (Thinking)90.6
8DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)90.2#155 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
9Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)89.8#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
10Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)89.4#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
11Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Thinking)89.3#184 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)
12Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)89.3#268 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
13GPT-OSS-120B (High)88.9#346 (GPT-OSS-120B)
14MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Thinking)88.8#167 (MiMo-V2.5-Pro)
15Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)88.1#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ruverbench-deep-research · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.