RuVerBench - Agentic Coding: leaderboard

LLM rubric verification of long research reports or coding trajectories, paper v2 Table 2. Overall is the macro-average category balanced accuracy. These are verifier scores, not task-solver performance. Runtime IDs and thinking settings follow Tables 8-9; the random reference is not a model. This series reports Balanced Accuracy (%). Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.29920v2.

Metric: Balanced Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05) (xHigh)89.4#63 (GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05))
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)86.5#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)85#51 (Claude Opus 4.7)
4Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)84.3#113 (Kimi K2.6)
5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)83.8#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)83#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
7DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)81.3#155 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
8GLM-5.1 (Thinking)80.8#109 (GLM-5.1)
9Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) (Thinking)79.9
10MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Thinking)78.5#167 (MiMo-V2.5-Pro)
11GPT-OSS-120B (High)77.1#346 (GPT-OSS-120B)
12Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Thinking)75#184 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)
13Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)74#192 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
14GPT-OSS-20B (High)72.3#523 (GPT-OSS-20B)
15Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)71.6#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ruverbench-agentic-coding · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.