RuleWorld: leaderboard

RuleWorld (2026) tests whether LLMs can locate and apply externally provided procedural rules from a large pool of abstract, deliberately non-commonsense rules. With all 1,000 rules of the pool in the prompt, the score is the mean of six exact-match accuracies (single-rule, parallel multi-rule and multi-hop QA, with rules in first-order logic and in natural language), in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Exact-match accuracy (%; x100 of the 0-1 score; mean of the six task-representation cells (single-rule, parallel multi-rule over 2-8 rules, and 2-4 hop multi-hop QA, each with rules in first-order logic and in natural language); all 1,000 abstract, non-commonsense procedural rules of the pool prepended to the prompt (full-context prompting); exact match on the boxed answer list, partial credit per matching position; 10 questions per task type and difficulty level for each of five seeds; temperature 0 (Qwen3-32B 0.6)). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.677.63#158
2GPT-5.5 (2026-04-23)72.83#33
3GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13)67.96#184
4DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)66.87#403 (DeepSeek V3.2)
5Llama 3.1 70B Instruct54.9#1541
6Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct53.07#1093
7Llama 3.3 70B Instruct51.62#1353
8Qwen 3 32B51.32#960
9Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct50.77#1216
10Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct42.97#1745

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ruleworld · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.