RuBench: leaderboard

RuBench 1.0 (2026) measures deployed coding-agent configurations (agent CLI, model and reasoning effort) on 25 repository-level bug-fix tasks in Python, PHP, TypeScript and JavaScript whose specifications are written natively in Russian, graded by withheld maintainer regression tests. Pass@1 over three runs in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass@1 (%; all 25 tasks; pass@1, mean share of tasks resolved over three independent runs, judged by the withheld upstream maintainer regression tests; 25 repository-level fix tasks from aiohttp, aiogram, Laravel, NestJS and Fastify with task statements natively written in Russian; deployed agent CLI, model and reasoning effort as one configuration, product defaults otherwise, network access allowed). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 6 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.8 (xHigh)78.7#56 (Claude Opus 4.8)
2Claude Sonnet 5 (xHigh)74.7#111 (Claude Sonnet 5)
3GPT-5.5 (xHigh)66.7#49 (GPT-5.5)
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)49.3#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
5Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)46.7#101 (Gemini 3.5 Flash)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=rubench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.