RPCBench - Error Group - Underspecified Premise - Conditional Localization: leaderboard

RPCBench tests proactive premise critique in recommendation requests. This series measures conditional localization on the Underspecified Premise subset (1,300 questions), using the same eleven-model, three-judge experiment as the headline paper. Published CLA fractions from the authors' per-model CSV are scaled once to Localization Accuracy (%). Higher is better; domains and nested premise-error groups are related slices of the same experiment.

Metric: Localization Accuracy (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.661.11#97
2Qwen 3.5 35B A3B58.5#270
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)58#66
4Qwen 3.5 397B A17B57.87#155
5DeepSeek V4 Pro56.35#113
6GPT-5.555.96#34
7Qwen 3.5 122B A10B55.9#186
8Qwen 3.5 Plus55#136
9DeepSeek V4 Flash54.17#156
10Llama 3.1 8B Instruct48.46#1021
11Llama 3.1 70B Instruct38#570

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #6 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=rpcbench-error-group-underspecified-premise-conditional-localization · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-07.