RPCBench - Domain - MIND-small - Evidence Faithfulness: leaderboard

RPCBench tests proactive premise critique in recommendation requests. This series measures evidence faithfulness on the MIND-small subset (703 questions), using the same eleven-model, three-judge experiment as the headline paper. Published EFI fractions from the authors' per-model CSV are scaled once to Faithfulness Index (%). Higher is better; domains and nested premise-error groups are related slices of the same experiment.

Metric: Faithfulness Index (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 122B A10B86.42#335
2GPT-5.586.06#48
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B86.06#245
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B85.78#492
5Qwen 3.5 Plus83.93#232
6Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)79.37#93
7DeepSeek V4 Pro78.73#188
8DeepSeek V4 Flash76.88#259
9Claude Sonnet 4.672.05#159
10Llama 3.1 70B Instruct42.89#1629
11Llama 3.1 8B Instruct33.14#4318

No result here: #4 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #9 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=rpcbench-domain-mind-small-evidence-faithfulness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-08.