RPCBench - Domain - MIND-small - Evidence Distortion: leaderboard
RPCBench tests proactive premise critique in recommendation requests. This series measures evidence distortion on the MIND-small subset (703 questions), using the same eleven-model, three-judge experiment as the headline paper. Published F1R fractions from the authors' per-model CSV are scaled once to Evidence Distortion Rate (%). Lower is better; domains and nested premise-error groups are related slices of the same experiment.
Metric: Evidence Distortion Rate (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 11 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 | 19.63 | #34 |
| 2 | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 23.47 | #570 |
| 3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 23.61 | #66 |
| 4 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B | 24.75 | #155 |
| 5 | Qwen 3.5 122B A10B | 25.75 | #186 |
| 6 | Qwen 3.5 35B A3B | 25.89 | #270 |
| 7 | Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 27.88 | #1021 |
| 8 | Qwen 3.5 Plus | 27.88 | #136 |
| 9 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | 28.88 | #156 |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 30.3 | #97 |
| 11 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 30.3 | #113 |
No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #6 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=rpcbench-domain-mind-small-evidence-distortion · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-07.