RPCBench - Domain - Goodreads Dual-Domain - Composite Premise Critique: leaderboard
RPCBench tests proactive premise critique in recommendation requests. This series measures composite premise critique on the Goodreads Dual-Domain subset (878 questions), using the same eleven-model, three-judge experiment as the headline paper. Published CPCC fractions from the authors' per-model CSV are scaled once to Composite Score (0-100). Higher is better; domains and nested premise-error groups are related slices of the same experiment.
Metric: Composite Score (0-100). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B | 49.02 | #245 |
| 2 | Qwen 3.5 122B A10B | 48.82 | #335 |
| 3 | Qwen 3.5 Plus | 48.26 | #232 |
| 4 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 47.52 | #188 |
| 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 47.36 | #93 |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 | 46.54 | #48 |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 45.88 | #159 |
| 8 | Qwen 3.5 35B A3B | 44.69 | #492 |
| 9 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | 44.05 | #259 |
| 10 | Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | 11.47 | #4318 |
| 11 | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 8.68 | #1629 |
No result here: #4 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #9 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=rpcbench-domain-goodreads-dual-domain-composite-premise-critique · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-08.