Ring-1T Report - MultiChallenge: leaderboard

MultiChallenge: multi-turn conversations that test whether the model keeps track of earlier instructions and context, score in percent. From Table 1 of inclusionAI's Ring-1T technical report, comparing Ring-1T with DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (Thinking), Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507, Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 Thinking (High), evaluated with a 32K context window. Baselines use official hyperparameters for open models and vendor-recommended settings for APIs, and where an official score exists the report keeps the higher of its reproduction and the official figure; the GPT-5 Thinking (High) cell is marked as taken from official model documentation.

Metric: MultiChallenge. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 (High)69.6#163 (GPT-5)
2Gemini 2.5 Pro54.58#262
3Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)52.75#460
4Ring-1T50.92#628
5DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Thinking)45.79#442 (DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ring-1t-report-multichallenge · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.