Ring-1T Report - LCB-v6 (2408-2505) (Avg@4): leaderboard

LiveCodeBench v6 coding problems dated August 2024 to May 2025, pass rate averaged over 4 samples. From Table 1 of inclusionAI's Ring-1T technical report, comparing Ring-1T with DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (Thinking), Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507, Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 Thinking (High), evaluated with a 128K context window, extended with YaRN for models whose native context is shorter. Baselines use official hyperparameters for open models and vendor-recommended settings for APIs, and where an official score exists the report keeps the higher of its reproduction and the official figure.

Metric: LCB-v6 (2408-2505) (Avg@4). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 (High)80.6#163 (GPT-5)
2Ring-1T78.3#628
3Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)75.72#460
4DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Thinking)75.33#442 (DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus)
5Gemini 2.5 Pro70.65#262

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ring-1t-report-lcb-v6-2408-2505-avg-4 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.