Ring-1T Report - CNMO 2024: leaderboard
CNMO 2024: problems from the 2024 Chinese National Mathematical Olympiad, accuracy in percent. From Table 1 of inclusionAI's Ring-1T technical report, comparing Ring-1T with DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (Thinking), Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507, Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 Thinking (High), evaluated with a 64K context window. Baselines use official hyperparameters for open models and vendor-recommended settings for APIs, and where an official score exists the report keeps the higher of its reproduction and the official figure.
Metric: CNMO 2024. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 5 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking) | 89.5 | #460 |
| 2 | Ring-1T | 88.54 | #628 |
| 3 | GPT-5 (High) | 87.93 | #163 (GPT-5) |
| 4 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Thinking) | 85.42 | #442 (DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus) |
| 5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | 80.64 | #262 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ring-1t-report-cnmo-2024 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.