ReasonTabQA: leaderboard

ReasonTabQA (TeleAI (China Telecom), 2026, with Chongqing University and Beihang University) poses questions over industrial tables in Chinese and English from 30 industry sub-domains, including multi-table and multi-sheet directories, nested headers and very large tables. Each model writes a Python program that reads the table files with pandas and prints an answer, which an LLM judge compares with the annotated gold answer; accuracy in percent, higher is better. The authors' TabCodeRL models are fine-tuned on the benchmark's own training split.

Metric: Answer Accuracy (%; LLM judge against gold answers, program-aided). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 33 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)67.58#111
2Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)66.2#152 (Claude Opus 4.5)
3Doubao-1.5-Thinking-Pro64.48#236
4Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)62.53#397 (Claude Sonnet 4)
5Kimi K259.57#435
6GPT-5.2 (Non-reasoning)59.46#172 (GPT-5.2)
7Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)58.76#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
8GPT-4o56.9#741
9DeepSeek R155.8#467
10O1 Mini55.8#761
11QwQ-32B54.1#909
12DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B53.64#1780
13Qwen 3 30B A3B (Thinking)53.61#1124 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
14Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)53.13#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
15DeepSeek V352.15#705

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=reasontabqa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.