RealClawBench - Data and Codebase Querying: leaderboard

RealClawBench (2026) turns real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions into 281 reproducible tasks with reconstructed workspaces, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime and scored by deterministic task-specific verifiers over three runs. This board is the verifier pass rate (%) on the data and codebase querying tasks; higher is better.

Metric: Verifier pass rate (%) on the 88 data and codebase querying tasks of 281 released tasks reconstructed from real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime (file read, write, edit, search and shell tools, 600-second timeout, temperature 1.0) and scored by case-specific deterministic Python verifiers; mean of three independent runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.768.6#79
2GPT-5.564.4#49
3DeepSeek V4 Pro61.7#188
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)60.2#94
5MiMo-V2.5-Pro59.8#279
6Claude Sonnet 4.659.1#161
7GLM-5.158.7#179
8Kimi K2.658.3#178
9MiniMax-M2.757.2#518
10Qwen 3.6 Plus56.4#222
11Gemma 4 31B56.1#394
12DeepSeek V4 Flash55.7#258
13Claude Opus 4.651.5#102
14GPT-OSS-120B42.4#700

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=realclawbench-data-and-codebase-querying · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.