RealClawBench - Command Execution: leaderboard
Metric: Verifier pass rate (%) on the 24 command-execution tasks of 281 released tasks reconstructed from real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime (file read, write, edit, search and shell tools, 600-second timeout, temperature 1.0) and scored by case-specific deterministic Python verifiers; mean of three independent runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2028. 14 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K2.6 | 66.7 |
| 2 | GLM-5.1 | 66.7 |
| 3 | GPT-5.5 | 65.3 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 65.3 |
| 5 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 63.9 |
| 6 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 63.9 |
| 7 | DeepSeek V4 Flash | 62.5 |
| 8 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 59.7 |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 58.3 |
| 10 | GPT-OSS-120B | 56.9 |
| 11 | MiniMax-M2.7 | 55.6 |
| 12 | Qwen 3.6 Plus | 54.2 |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 52.8 |
| 14 | Gemma 4 31B | 52.8 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=realclawbench-command-execution · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-29.