RealClawBench - Command Execution: leaderboard

RealClawBench (2026) turns real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions into 281 reproducible tasks with reconstructed workspaces, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime and scored by deterministic task-specific verifiers over three runs. This board is the verifier pass rate (%) on the command-execution tasks; higher is better.

Metric: Verifier pass rate (%) on the 24 command-execution tasks of 281 released tasks reconstructed from real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime (file read, write, edit, search and shell tools, 600-second timeout, temperature 1.0) and scored by case-specific deterministic Python verifiers; mean of three independent runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K2.666.7#178
2GLM-5.166.7#179
3GPT-5.565.3#49
4Claude Opus 4.765.3#79
5DeepSeek V4 Pro63.9#188
6MiMo-V2.5-Pro63.9#279
7DeepSeek V4 Flash62.5#258
8Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)59.7#94
9Claude Opus 4.658.3#102
10GPT-OSS-120B56.9#700
11MiniMax-M2.755.6#518
12Qwen 3.6 Plus54.2#222
13Claude Sonnet 4.652.8#161
14Gemma 4 31B52.8#394

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=realclawbench-command-execution · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.