RealClawBench - Code Fixing: leaderboard

RealClawBench (2026) turns real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions into 281 reproducible tasks with reconstructed workspaces, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime and scored by deterministic task-specific verifiers over three runs. This board is the verifier pass rate (%) on the code-fixing tasks; higher is better.

Metric: Verifier pass rate (%) on the 63 code-fixing tasks of 281 released tasks reconstructed from real OpenClaw developer-agent sessions, run in the shared OpenClaw agent runtime (file read, write, edit, search and shell tools, 600-second timeout, temperature 1.0) and scored by case-specific deterministic Python verifiers; mean of three independent runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2028. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1MiMo-V2.5-Pro61.4#279
2DeepSeek V4 Pro60.3#188
3Claude Opus 4.758.7#79
4GPT-5.557.7#49
5Kimi K2.656.1#178
6Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)52.4#94
7GLM-5.151.9#179
8Claude Opus 4.650.3#102
9DeepSeek V4 Flash50.3#258
10Claude Sonnet 4.649.7#161
11MiniMax-M2.749.2#518
12GPT-OSS-120B47.6#700
13Qwen 3.6 Plus47.6#222
14Gemma 4 31B47.6#394

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=realclawbench-code-fixing · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.