Qwen-Image-Bench - Quality: leaderboard
Metric: Visual quality pillar Q-Judger score (0-100), the unified judge model fine-tuned from Qwen3.6-27B on expert annotations, aggregated bottom-up from 56 third-level facets, over the 1,000 creator-designed Chinese prompts; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 18 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT Image 2 | 58.65 |
| 2 | Nano Banana Pro | 55.67 |
| 3 | GPT Image 1.5 | 55.14 |
| 4 | Nano Banana 2 | 54.77 |
| 5 | Seedream 4.5 | 54.41 |
| 6 | Qwen Image 2.0 Pro | 54.39 |
| 7 | Seedream 4.0 | 54.01 |
| 8 | FLUX 2 Max | 53.64 |
| 9 | Seedream 5.0 | 52.55 |
| 10 | GPT Image 1 | 52.34 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=qwen-image-bench-quality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.