Qwen-Image-Bench - Human Expert Rating - Quality: leaderboard
Metric: Visual quality pillar professional annotator rating on a 1 to 10 scale over 1,000 prompts per pillar, averaged; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 18 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT Image 2 | 9.48 |
| 2 | Nano Banana 2 | 8.87 |
| 3 | Nano Banana Pro | 8.79 |
| 4 | GPT Image 1.5 | 7.37 |
| 5 | Qwen Image 2.0 Pro | 7.03 |
| 6 | Seedream 5.0 | 6.55 |
| 7 | Seedream 4.5 | 5.56 |
| 8 | Qwen Image 2512 | 5.48 |
| 9 | GPT Image 1 | 5.2 |
| 10 | Seedream 4.0 | 4.75 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=qwen-image-bench-human-expert-rating-quality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.