QuarkMedBench - Highlight: leaderboard

Metric: Highlight score rate (%): share of the Highlight rubric points (beneficial extended recommendations beyond the core facts) that the answer earns, on a stratified sample of 2,000 real Chinese online medical and health queries (single- and multi-turn), answers scored against query-specific rubrics (Essential, Important, Highlight and Pitfall items) by a Qwen3-235B judge, without an output length limit; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2032. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)49.11#366 (Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507)
2Gemini 2.5 Pro45.01#145
3DeepSeek V3.241.86#198
4GPT-5.140.37#131
5Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)40.12#304 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
6DeepSeek R1 052838.79#217
7Gemini 3 Pro38.75#77
8Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)38.3#424 (Qwen 3 32B)
9GPT-5.233.76#105
10Seed-1.632.3#257
11Qwen 3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)31.38#488 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
12Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)30.82#667 (Qwen 3 8B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=quarkmedbench-highlight · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.