QuarkMedBench (1,000-Word Limit) - Highlight: leaderboard

Metric: Highlight score rate (%): share of the Highlight rubric points (beneficial extended recommendations beyond the core facts) that the answer earns, on a stratified sample of 2,000 real Chinese online medical and health queries (single- and multi-turn), answers scored against query-specific rubrics (Essential, Important, Highlight and Pitfall items) by a Qwen3-235B judge, with a strict limit of 1,000 words per answer; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)45.11#304 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
2Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)42.93#366 (Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507)
3GPT-5.241.22#105
4Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)39.5#424 (Qwen 3 32B)
5GPT-5.136.63#131
6Qwen 3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)34.77#488 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
7Gemini 3 Pro34.17#77
8DeepSeek V3.232.75#198
9DeepSeek R1 052832.51#217
10Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)28.02#667 (Qwen 3 8B)
11Gemini 2.5 Pro27.99#145
12Seed-1.625#257

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=quarkmedbench-1-000-word-limit-highlight · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.