QuarkMedBench: leaderboard

Metric: Base score (%): the rubric score rate, weighting Essential, Important, Highlight and Pitfall items 2:1:1:2 after max-min normalization, on a stratified sample of 2,000 real Chinese online medical and health queries (single- and multi-turn), answers scored against query-specific rubrics (Essential, Important, Highlight and Pitfall items) by a Qwen3-235B judge, without an output length limit; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Pro74.57#145
2Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)74.54#366 (Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507)
3DeepSeek V3.271.43#198
4GPT-5.170.9#131
5DeepSeek R1 052869.96#217
6Gemini 3 Pro69.11#77
7Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)67.62#304 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
8GPT-5.266.19#105
9Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)64.91#424 (Qwen 3 32B)
10Seed-1.661.91#257
11Qwen 3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)58.93#488 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
12Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)57.19#667 (Qwen 3 8B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=quarkmedbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.