Quantum API Drift - Qiskit 2.0: leaderboard

Part of the quantum-api-drift benchmark (Khalifa University, 2026): code for 50 Qiskit HumanEval-derived tasks is requested for Qiskit 2.0 and executed in a Qiskit 2.0 environment, three samples per prompt at temperature 0.8. The score is Pass@1 in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Pass@1 (%; unbiased estimator from 3 samples per task, macro-averaged over 50 Qiskit HumanEval-derived tasks) of code generated for Qiskit 2.0 (2.0.0), executed in that Qiskit environment; REST API access at temperature 0.8 with a 1,024-token output cap; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.785.33#79
2GPT-5.3 Codex79.84#116
3Claude Sonnet 4.670#161
4GPT-5.470#123
5Grok 4.2063.33#297
6Kimi K250#439
7Nemotron 3 Super49.33#768
8Gemma 4 31B (IT)47.33#342
9GPT-OSS-120B42.67#700
10GPT-5.4 Nano40#635
11Devstral 233.11#1003
12Qwen3 Coder31.33#586
13Qwen 3 32B29.33#960
14GLM-4.7 Flash24.67#1259
15Llama 3.3 70B Instruct12.67#1357

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=quantum-api-drift-qiskit-2-0 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.