QMFOLBench - University: leaderboard

University-topic subset of QMFOLBench (Zheng et al., 2026): 720 monadic first-order logic deduction tasks phrased mostly about students, each asking whether a conclusion is True, False or Unknown given shuffled premises. Accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; 720 university-topic tasks). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)99.86#91 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2GPT-5.4 (High)98.19#121 (GPT-5.4)
3DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)96.67#403 (DeepSeek V3.2)
4Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)92.92#358 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
5Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)84.72#158 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)79.72#403 (DeepSeek V3.2)
7Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)65.42#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
8GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)61.25#121 (GPT-5.4)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=qmfolbench-university · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.