QIMMA - MedAraBench: leaderboard

MedAraBench Arabic medical multiple-choice questions, as run in the QIMMA Arabic leaderboard. Scored with LightEval log-likelihood over the answer options with character-length normalization rather than generated answers, so reasoning-tuned models can land near chance; accuracy 0-100, higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%, log-likelihood multiple choice). Source: huggingface.co. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 83 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct54.86#541
2Gemma 4 31B54.5#212
3Qwen 3.5 122B A10B52.49#184
4Jais-2-70B-Chat50.89#430
5AIC-150.78#235
6Fanar-1-9B-Instruct48.53#635
7Qwen 3.5 397B A17B47.97#154
8Gemma 4 26B A4B47.77#360
9Hala-9B47.54#517
10AceGPT-v2-32B-Chat47.32#518
11Qwen 3.5 35B A3B46.46#268
12Qwen 3.5 35B A3B Base46.32#319
13Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct44.19#469
14gemma-3-27B-pt43.72#505
15Atlas-Chat-9B42.52#710

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=qimma-medarabench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.