PureDocBench - Real Degraded - Reading Order Edit Distance: leaderboard

Metric: Reading-order normalized edit distance (%) between the predicted and reference block sequences, times 100, on the real degraded track (the same pages through four physical acquisition chains: phone photos of prints and of photocopies, screen photographs, and screenshots with social-media compression) of 1,475 source pages in 10 domains and 66 subcategories, rendered from LLM-written HTML/CSS with source-linked annotations for text, formulas, tables and reading order; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 58 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Qwen 3.8 27B36.4
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)38.6
3Qwen 3.5 27B39
4Qwen 3.5 397B A17B39.9
5Claude Opus 540
6Qwen 3.5 122B A10B40.1
7Gemini 3.6 Flash40.6
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B41.9
9GLM-5.3 Flash42.3
10Qwen 3.5 9B43.7
11Qwen 3.6 35B A3B46.9
12Qwen3.8-Flash-Next47.2
13Qwen 3.5 4B47.7
14Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)48.1
15GPT-5.6 Sol50.2

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=puredocbench-real-degraded-reading-order-edit-distance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.