PureDocBench - Digital Degraded - Reading Order Edit Distance: leaderboard
Metric: Reading-order normalized edit distance (%) between the predicted and reference block sequences, times 100, on the digitally degraded track (the same pages under ten simulated scene templates such as aging, binding, photocopying, compression, lighting and geometric artifacts) of 1,475 source pages in 10 domains and 66 subcategories, rendered from LLM-written HTML/CSS with source-linked annotations for text, formulas, tables and reading order; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 58 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3.8 27B | 32.5 |
| 2 | Qwen 3.5 122B A10B | 36.6 |
| 3 | Qwen 3.5 27B | 36.7 |
| 4 | Qwen 3.5 397B A17B | 37.6 |
| 5 | Qwen 3.5 35B A3B | 37.9 |
| 6 | Gemini 3.6 Flash | 39.1 |
| 7 | GLM-5.3 Flash | 39.1 |
| 8 | Qwen 3.5 9B | 39.6 |
| 9 | Qwen 3.5 4B | 41.2 |
| 10 | Qwen 3.6 35B A3B | 41.2 |
| 11 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 41.7 |
| 12 | Claude Opus 5 | 42 |
| 13 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 43 |
| 14 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 44.7 |
| 15 | Qwen 3.6 27B | 45.7 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=puredocbench-digital-degraded-reading-order-edit-distance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.