PureDocBench - Clean: leaderboard

Metric: Overall parsing score (0-100): mean of text accuracy (100 times one minus the text normalized edit distance), formula CDM and table TEDS, on the clean track (pages rendered straight from their HTML/CSS source) of 1,475 source pages in 10 domains and 66 subcategories, rendered from LLM-written HTML/CSS with source-linked annotations for text, formulas, tables and reading order; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2028. 58 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GLM-5.3 Flash83.04
2Claude Opus 582.99
3Qwen 3.8 27B80.45
4Gemini 3.6 Flash79.97
5Qwen 3.5 122B A10B76.14
6GPT-5.6 Sol74.15
7Qwen 3.5 9B73.87
8Qwen 3.5 4B73.45
9Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)72.32
10Qwen3.8-Flash-Next72.23
11Qwen 3.6 35B A3B72.14
12Qwen 3.5 27B72.07
13Qwen 3.6 27B70.2
14Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)70.04
15Qwen 3.5 397B A17B69.12

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=puredocbench-clean · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.