ProofBench: leaderboard

A mirror of the Vals AI ProofBench leaderboard as republished by benchmarklist.com, from a snapshot dated 28 July 2026. Upstream a model is given a theorem in natural language plus its Lean 4 formalisation and has to produce a proof the Lean checker accepts, using search and execution tools. The figure is the percentage of problems proved, higher is better. Source: www.vals.ai/benchmarks/proof_bench.

Metric: Score (imported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Source: epoch.ai. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 54 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 578#12
2GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)77#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
3Claude Fable 5 (Max)77#16 (Claude Fable 5)
4GPT-5.6 Terra (xHigh)71#41 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
5Kimi K370#30
6Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)69#37 (Claude Opus 4.8)
7Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)66#57 (Claude Sonnet 5)
8GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05) (xHigh)56#59 (GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05))
9GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)54#68 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
10Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)54#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)
11GPT-5.5 (xHigh)50#31 (GPT-5.5)
12Claude Opus 4.6 (Max)50#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
13Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)50#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
14Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)45#90 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
15Muse Spark 1.1 (xHigh)39#52 (Muse Spark 1.1)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=proofbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.