PRISM-VLM - Visual Discrimination: leaderboard

The visual-discrimination axis of PRISM-VLM (NAVER, 2026): the model picks the accurate caption for an image from a pair in which the other caption changes one detail, such as a color, count or position. Accuracy in percent with chance at 50; higher is better.

Metric: Per-axis mean score (%; forced A/B choice between the gold caption and a one-detail minimal edit (chance 50%); over PRISM-VLM's 6,238 items recycled from 15 public VLM benchmarks (five seeds of 100 items per benchmark); GPT-5 (low effort) synthesizes the perturbations and grades the open-ended axes; each model at the lowest reasoning effort its provider exposes, temperature 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 42 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash (Minimal)93.7#159 (Gemini 3 Flash)
2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Minimal)92.6#363 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite)
3Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)91.5#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
4Gemini 2.0 Flash90#702
5Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite87.6#1032
6Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite87.5#958
7GPT-4.1 Mini86.7#775
8Molmo2-8B86.4#1488
9GPT-5 Mini (Minimal)86#349 (GPT-5 Mini)
10Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)85.9#803 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
11Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct85.8#982
12Gemma 4 E4B84#2217
13Claude Haiku 4.583.9#568
14Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct83#1281
15GPT-5.4 Mini82.7#389

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=prism-vlm-visual-discrimination · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.